SPECIAL research and analysis group -- projects HARRIS will be "given the job"...
By
comments and news from net, Posted in Politics / National
A discreet, covert, non-publicized small group of cyber-data specialists and former Intel agency assets... 5 months ago formed a "working group in the shadows" called THE COMMITTEE. They set themselves the task of being able to predict the election result BEFORE the official day of polling arrives. Here is a conversation we had with them, WEDNESDAY.
Person "Y" is speaking for the group. We at DTRI are designated as "us."
= = = =
us= It's only a handful of days now. A sizeable amount of early voting has happened. A lot of drama between the camps has happened. How does THE COMMITTEE see things at the moment? You know 'Snapshot in Time' overview.
y= Odds favor Harris. Not necessarily in an organic way, but in the sense that the DEMS on her behalf can rig the election this time much more easily. Because they have a cover story. A two-pronged cover story. Part One is that women in general are furious over the patronizing and insensitive Trump stance on women's bodily health issues. And btw, it's a fact that many women are buying the allegation that Trump picked three SCOTUS members especially to destroy Roe v. Wade. Part two is that Trump [defacto] insulted all Latino Americans by pooh-poohing the furor over the smear insults told by the on-stage comic Sunday nite. Put these two factors together, and it's now simple for the DEMS to effect voter fraud in certain select counties in swing states, and you then have a stolen election which is nigh on impossible to prove stolen, and also impossible to be effectively challenged... Because the DEMS will probably be clever enough to manufacture just only as many fraudulent votes- as they need to win the electoral college.
us= So that's it, you are predicting a sly and subtle election steal?
y= Yes. Because it will be so easy to perpetrate. And so difficult to challenge, since Harris will get a decent amount of voter turnout. She will not fail to bring a reasonable volume of turnout. And that's all the DEMS handling her need. A reasonable amount of turnout. Simply enough to make the story of HOW SHE WINS -plausible. Plus, there's an additional two factors which conservatives are failing to evaluate accurately.
us= What are they?
y= One is the fact that since the DEM party transformed itself into something it didn't used to be, what's left to constitute its "base" is largely unsophisticated people. People who are not sitting in an armchair after dinner reading THE SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE ~ [i.e. As Mr. Limbaugh used to say - Low Information Voters]. And since they're not eyeing her with the same critical evaluation her political opposition does, the many vague platitudes she voices amount to-- "good enough for me" in their minds. She promises to lower food prices. The don't demand details. She promises to keep working for a cease-fire in Gaza. They don't press for details. She promises to fix a broken immigtation system. They don't press for details. Also, due to her base being emphatically unsophisticated, her campaign method of repeating teleprompted speeches and talking points like a robot --does not disturb them. Most of them don't find it odd. To them, it's like Top 40 radio. The repetition is not irritating. It simply hammers her vague tropes in -more impactfully. And the second fact of the two I'm spotlighting right now is... The lure for women voters of the ASPIRATIONAL vibe. Back in 2012, exit poll interviews discovered that voters at the time trusted Romney more to be able to improve the economy. Yet that was evaluating him as a technocrat. As for personal enthusiasm --voters held a greater amount for Obama in that he was perceived as THEIR GUY FIGHTING FOR THEM... i.e. An overall vague vibe. This is what Harris has been selling. An overall vague vibe --surrounding her verbal promises that she will fight for women to get certain rights. Again, the DEM voter of today is unsophisticated and does not press for details. They dislike Trump as a personality and in their bias they want to believe that KH is a suitable answer to TDS. And because they want to believe, all facts disregarded, THEY TALK THEMSELVES into believing,
us= So your group has been analyzing data through computer programs and blending it with human analysis. What do you have as a comment right now? Giving a snapshot of this moment in time, who would you say will win the election?
y= Well, things can still change, but as of this very moment? We estimate a 74% chance Trump will not get the seat. And Harris will be declared the winner.
= = = =
RELATED OTHER ITEM
https://henrymakow.com/2024/11/nov-1---conservatives-arefalse.html
..