What is the likelihood that KH got the questions in advance? ........... HUGE !!
By
comments and news from net, Posted in Conspiracies / Conspiracy Theories
What is the likelihood that KH got the questions in advance?
We'd estimate... 95% chance YES. Why? Because there's so much at stake for the DEMS.
MOTIVE: -- Motive to cheat on the debate is super super super high. Is the opportunity there also? Certainly, ABC TV is owned by super gay/woke, super psycho, super corrupt, super leftie NWO-controlled DIZZZZY-knee. (Disney).
OPPORTUNITY: -- Would Disney mind if the questions are leaked as long as they don't get caught? Not at all.....
MEANS: -- Do the DEMS have the means to get the questions leaked? CERTAINLY. Disney would love to leak the questions to KH's team. So how could it be done in a way such that ABC/CuckooDisney does not get caught? Simple. Create a wall of plausible deniability. Which is easy easy easy to do. You just give the DEMS an access code to hack into the computer file where the debate questions are stored. Then if it ever comes out somehow that KH got the questions in advance, the explanation would go this way: ABC's computer got hacked by some rogue/random entity. That rogue entity then sent the questions to team KH with a preface saying... "ANONYMOUS WELL-WISHER WANTS TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT QUESTIONS MIGHT BE ASKED. Our computer generated these as the most likely questions ABC will ask in the debate."
Such an email comes from an account that is wiped right after the sending and --Voila! You have no direct trail to ABC. And then doesn't it turn out to be good luck for KH that the suggested questions to study for ---are the exact ones asked? Well, that's just good luck then........ SEE HOW EASY IT IS?
Now why do we suggest that most likely it has already happened? Because the stakes are SO HIGH for the KH team and the DEM party overall. If KH does not come out seeming minimally cogent during the live debate, it's game over for her candidacy. And disaster for the down ballot. Keep in mind too-- that the bar, the basic criteria for her having good marks in the debate, is set so low as to be laughable. All she has to do is give answers that lack word salads. And since her brain is wired to give word salads in extemporaneous political replies to questions, there is only ONE WAY to avoid an effusion of word salads. CHEAT. Know the questions in advance and memorize answers your handlers give you.
People who lean left or at minimum give her any kind of (undeserved) credence at all as a political candidate-- are INTELLECTUALLY LACKING to begin with. So for that realm of the populace, a "GOOD SHOWING" by Kamala in the debate DOES NOT REQUIRE HER to have great answers. OR EVEN GOOD ANSWERS. Or truthful answers. Or even rational answers. All that's required for her to snare a PASSING GRADE amidst her cheering section is.. No major word salads.
Thus, IF SHE GETS THRU THE DEBATE WITHOUT DOING HER USUAL, without sounding like the shallow, non-serious, mentally lazy idiot that she is, if she gets thru the debate WITHOUT EFFUSING WORD SALADS....
You can quite logically construe... SHE GOT THE QUESTIONS IN ADVANCE.... Soooo let's see what happens Tuesday.
= = = =
RELATED OTHER ITEM
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/democrats-now-hate-pollster-nate-silver-as-his/
https://www.wnd.com/2024/09/tom-cotton-exposes-cnn-election-interference-by-intel-officials-including-dana-bashs-ex-husband-live-on-air/
https://www.wnd.com/2024/09/watch-bernie-sanders-spills-the-beans-on-kamalas-election-strategy/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/kash-patel-believes-kamala-harris-will-be-installed/
..