We were just now listing to video of the ALEX JONES TRIAL... Geesh what a circus.
By
twtt from net, Posted in Law and Legal Matters
And it seems like it's his fault things went against him. WHY? Because the prosecutor is a childish noodnink who looks like he learned courtroom behavior from watching TV shows aimed at 18 year old viewers. The judge is a biased immature idiot. And it should have been easy to foil he prosecutors lines of convo. But it appears Alex and other witness has no mental preparation, no set attitude and no strategy for being questions. And his lawyer seems green, mousy, feckless. What a mess! How could they let this go against them? it's a pitiful shame. OF COURSE SANDY HOOK was a psyop. There are so many bits of evidence, concrete evidence we saw proving that. Only a brainwashed fool who believes msm is REAL NEWS media --would think otherwise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKb-ySKkN5Q
= = = =
THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF DEFAMATION -- Any intentionally false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation.
= = = =
Key words there are INTENTIONALLY FALSE. We certainly have not viewed a lot of footage form the trial but it seems outlandish the plaintiff was able to convince any jury that AJ *intentionally* made false statements. Unless AJ has has had truly feckless lawyers all thru this.
= = = =
https://www.infowars.com/posts/is-this-the-end-of-maga-media/